Labour’s Sexism Problem Goes Beyond a Single Party

Labour’s lack of female leaders has sparked necessary conversations about sexism within the party and beyond. Jess Phillips’ candid remarks have brought attention to this issue, highlighting the ways in which patriarchal structures can perpetuate inequality even within institutions that claim to champion progress.

As a seasoned politician with experience tackling issues like domestic abuse, Phillips is well aware of how power dynamics are embedded within social and political systems. Her assertion that Labour’s sexism is “a bit innit” – though blunt and perhaps off-putting to some – cuts to the heart of a deeper issue: the party’s record on promoting women.

Labour has never had a permanent female leader; instead, women like Margaret Beckett and Harriet Harman have served as acting leaders. This raises questions about the pipeline of talent within the party and how it chooses to promote its members. The current leadership contest serves to highlight Labour’s problem, with Andy Burnham widely seen as a frontrunner and Angela Rayner not yet declaring her intention to run.

But Phillips’ comments also underscore that sexism within Labour is merely a symptom of broader societal issues. When she says that every institution is “led by the patriarchy,” it’s hard not to think back to recent headlines about tax avoidance and austerity measures that disproportionately affect women. The connections between these policy decisions and leadership dynamics within parties like Labour are more complex than they initially seem.

Phillips’ comments also reveal a deep frustration with the way parties often respond to criticism of sexism. By framing their efforts as “bants” or attempts at humor, politicians can sidestep real discussions about power and inequality. This subtle but insidious form of gaslighting allows institutions to avoid confronting their own complicity in perpetuating patriarchy.

As we watch the Labour leadership contest unfold – or rather, fail to unfold with any great sense of urgency – it’s worth remembering Phillips’ words: “all that should matter to anyone in politics is that you care about the country and the right outcome.” In a world where politicians are increasingly seen as detached from their constituents, these comments offer a glimmer of hope. Perhaps we can begin to rebuild our institutions on more inclusive foundations.

Labour’s record remains a stark reminder of how far we still have to go in addressing sexism within politics.